Current morphological theory A comment on Robert Beard & Mark Volpe: Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology
نویسندگان
چکیده
I present a computational model that allows for a clean formal account of a wide variety of morphological phenomena. Much of what i present is based on the large literature on finite-state approaches to morphology, but it is more coherent in that I propose that all morphological operations can be modeled using a single regular operation: composition. I define this operation and give several examples of its application. Two morphological models, ‘Item and Arrangement’ approaches (e.g. Lieber’s), and ‘Item and Process’ approaches (e.g. Beard’s) are compared with respect to this computational model. I will argue that there is not as much difference between these views as morphologists like to suppose.
منابع مشابه
Acquistion of the Morphological Structure of the Lexicon Based on Lexical Similarity and Formal Analogy
The paper presents a computational model aiming at making the morphological structure of the lexicon emerge from the formal and semantic regularities of the words it contains. The model is purely lexemebased. The proposed morphological structure consists of (1) binary relations that connect each headword with words that are morphologically related, and especially with the members of its morphol...
متن کاملThe Form and Content of Derivational Relations
Morpheme based theories of word structure encourage us to think of derived words (e.g. \innatable") as built by adding one complex of phonological, syntactic and semantic content (/{bl j /, Adjective, `able to be verbed') to another (/innejt/, Verb | +NP]], `inflate'). This model lacks generality in a number of ways, however. (a) Derivational relationships may not involve the simple addition of...
متن کاملMorphemes and Lexemes versus “ Morphemes or Lexemes ? ”
More than a century after the first linguistic definition of the notion of morpheme by Baudoin de Courtenay (1895) and Sweet (1876), an ever-lasting debate – which I shall refer here as the “Morpheme or Lexeme” (M or L) debate – on the nature of linguistic bricks is still going on. Since a by-product of this debate is terminological confusion in the use of the four notions of morpheme, lexeme, ...
متن کاملA Categorial Framework for Composition in Multiple Linguistic Domains
We describe a computational framework for a grammar architecture in which different linguistic domains such as morphology, syntax, and semantics are treated not as separate components but compositional domains. Word and phrase formation are modeled as uniform processes contributing to the derivation of the semantic form. The morpheme, as well as the lexeme, has lexical representation in the for...
متن کاملThe contribution of morphology to word recognition.
Evidence of morphological processing was investigated in three word recognition tasks. In the first study, phonological ambiguity of the base morpheme in morphologically complex words of Serbo-Croatian was exploited in order to evaluate the claim that the base morpheme serves as the unit by which entries in the lexicon are accessed. An interaction of base morpheme ambiguity and affix characteri...
متن کامل